John Peter Smith Hospital Fort Worth Family Medicine Scandal

(Natural News) A shocking new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when meaning women are given covid vaccinations during their first or 2d trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous ballgame rate, killing 4 out of 5 unborn babies.

This stunning finding, explained below, is cocky-evident from the data published in a new study entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons." Just every bit disturbing as the information is the fact that the study authors plainly sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth well-nigh vaccines causing spontaneous abortions past obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.

Originally brought to our attention by a Life Site News article, nosotros checked with our own science contacts to review the information and double check all the math. In doing and so, we were able to confirm two things:

1. Aye, the study shows an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their get-go or second trimesters.
2. Yes, the study authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with quack obfuscation (explained below) or they are incompetent and made a glaring error that brings into question their credibility.

In other words, this study was nearly certainly a embrace-up to try to claim vaccinating pregnant women is perfectly prophylactic. Merely the report data actually evidence quite the oppose.

Here'southward how:

700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the third trimester

Table iv from the report, shown beneath, reveals that a total of 827 pregnant women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their first vaccine in their third trimester of pregnancy. This ways 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their first or 2d trimesters. (Yous take to read the fine print below the table to run into this disclosure.)

Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their outset or 2nd trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred earlier their pregnancies hit the 20-week mark. These are indicated equally "spontaneous abortions" in the table.

In uncomplicated math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the offset 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their first or second trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions among these pregnant women who were vaccinated.

It is important to annotation that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are known every bit "stillbirths" and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could not have mayhap occurred in women vaccinated during their third trimester, by definition.

Thus, the study authors dishonestly used the wrong denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" calculation, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their first or 2d trimesters.

Put some other way, it is impossible for a woman who was vaccinated for the first fourth dimension during her third trimester to have a "spontaneous abortion" in the first 20 weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the starting time 20 weeks (and pregnant women aren't time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't exist included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous ballgame rate.

The authors of this report should receive an award in the category of, "How to lie with statistics," because they plainly tried to pull a sleight-of-manus trick to make it appear that vaccines are safe for meaning women. In reality, they seem to be killing more four out of 5 unborn babies in the first xx weeks of gestation, at least in this data set. (Information technology's a small set of 127 pregnant women, and then we'd like to run into a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in order to get a more articulate pic.)

Apples and oranges, lemons and limes

A elementary way to explain this with a metaphor is to imagine a bag of 50 lemons and 50 limes, with a science study asking the question, "What pct of lemons are yellow?" The scientists count all the xanthous fruit and reach the number l. They mistakenly divide 50 into 100 considering at that place are 100 full piece of fruit, then they declare, "50% of lemons are yellow" because it's 50/100.

Simply the other 50 pieces of fruit can't perchance be included because they're limes, non lemons. So the right math is l/50, which means 100% of the lemons are yellow. That's the right answer.

In this science paper, they are using 827 equally the denominator, fifty-fifty when 700 out of those 827 women were just vaccinated in the 3rd trimester, which is long past the time window during which a "spontaneous abortion" can occur. And since meaning women aren't time travelers, they tin can't go back in fourth dimension and report a spontaneous abortion from months earlier.

If vaccine scientists either can't do this basic math — or are willfully deceiving the globe with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers — then "science" has already failed its core promise: to offer "evidence-based" conclusions to understand the globe around usa.

Even so when 4 out of 5 meaning women lose their babies in the first 20 weeks, these scientists falsely merits the spontaneous abortion rate is only 12.6%. Why? Considering they're covering upward the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, most likely.

In fact, the key author of the study, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is as well named in numerous other studies that claim to document adverse reactions in various vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. It raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro make the same mistake in other studies that ended vaccines posed no significant chance of adverse events? For example, hither's some other study he co-authored: "Agin events later on Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Consequence Reporting Arrangement (VAERS), 2011-2013."

That study concluded, "Review of VAERS reports did not identify whatsoever new or unexpected safe concerns after TIV-ID."

Just is that determination based on bad math, like the written report on covid vaccines given to pregnant women? We call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Perchance this aforementioned written report architect has made the aforementioned systematic error (or mayhap a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. It wouldn't be the first time 1 author was institute to take made systematic mistakes across dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.

And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Admitting to mistakes in conclusions. This is how science progresses, by pointing out errors and enervating they be addressed and corrected. We can't just accept bad math and call it "science" when the bad math doesn't check out.

Spike poly peptide injections into pregnant women an "barbarism," warns Dr. Peter McCullough

In the hateful time, it'south articulate that 4 out of 5 pregnancies are being terminated by covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the starting time xx weeks (at to the lowest degree, co-ordinate to the minor data set we have so far). And that ways the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly equally globalists hoped they would.

Recollect: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) evidence that covid vaccine spike proteins directly attack reproductive organs such equally the ovaries. Given that spike proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with human cells, it should be no surprise whatsoever that they are achieving a high charge per unit of spontaneous abortions in pregnant women.

I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine adept and editor of two medical journals. Although he does not characterize this as a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking significant women and causing more than fourscore% of unborn babies to be aborted. He calls it an "atrocity" and says the pushing of these vaccines on pregnant women is "shameful." You tin can hear him in his own words in the post-obit interview:

Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97

All this means that alive births may plummet by 3.2 million over the adjacent yr, in the Us alone, if every pregnant woman is vaccinated during the beginning 20 weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies being murdered in the womb, in this example, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is beingness chosen a medical "atrocity."

The fields of medicine and science have turned against humanity. They are now killing babies by the millions and injecting adults with spike protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, center attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.

The vaccine manufacture is at war with the human race. And live-born babies are their enemy. Joe Biden'due south land management czar once characterized homo children as an "environmental hazard."

This is a war. A bioweapons attack. And it goes beyond mere "crimes against humanity." It is a spiritual betrayal of the entire human race by the institutions of scientific discipline and medicine, both of which long pretended to be motivated by a desire to aid humanity, but are at present clearly shown to be working towards humanity'southward destruction.

Learn more than in today's heed-opening State of affairs Update podcast:

Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1

Hear a new podcast each weekday at:

https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport

yinglingdessitheigh83.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html

Share this post